SHOCKING: The mRNA COVID Jab Damages The Red Blood Cells! - The True Defender ! (2023)

mRNA vaccine damages the red blood cells! Scientists Prove It Under Microscope! The fact-checkers don’t focus on critical thinking, and with that, they are part of the government propaganda!

Not revealing the truth about the shot for the public represents a crime against humanity! We will show you something here that you won’t hear on the mainstream media! Now, the latest discoveries under a microscope revealed shocking truths about the vaccine and its effect on people’s organisms.

Join The True Defender Telegram Chanel Here:

The study revealed that once the person gets the vaccine, the images on the red blood cells show some abnormal membrane climbing together. Be ready. That’s only the beginning. The activated white blood cells can be seen everywhere on a single drop of blood, meaning that the vaccine stimulated them. Or, there is a worse variant, the toxins in the vaccine activated the white blood cells.

Other discoveries show nanoparticles which are most likely the result of the vaccine. It didn’t come as a shock to me to hear that it causes thrombosis or the clumping of cells.

Below you can see one video presenting the damaged red blood cells!

Montagnier, a professor who won a Nobel Prize in Science, and a virologist, said that any foreign substance in the body causes oxidative stress.

Everything indicates that the vaccine has adverse side effects on the organism. And, professor Montagnier isn’t the only one who is sounding the alarms.

Dr. Mercola explained Dr. Robert Malone’s words about the COVID shot dangers.

As explained by Malone, many months ago he warned the U.S. Food and Drug Administration that the spike protein — which the COVID-19 “vaccines” instruct your cells to make — could be dangerous. The FDA dismissed his concerns, saying they did not believe the spike protein was biologically active. Besides, the vaccine makers specifically designed the injections so that the spike protein would stick and not float about freely.

Well, they were wrong on both accounts. It’s since been well-established that, indeed, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein gets free, and that it is biologically active and causes severe problems. It is responsible for the most severe effects seen in COVID-19, such as bleeding disorders, blood clots throughout the body and heart problems.

These are the same problems we now see in a staggering number of people having received one or two shots of COVID-19 “vaccine.” For more in-depth information about how the spike protein causes these problems, please see my interview with Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., and Judy Mikovits, Ph.D.

Using the word vaccine isn’t really appropriate here, and I don’t want to contribute to the misuse of that word. These injections are clearly not vaccines. They don’t work like any previous conventional vaccines. As the actual inventor of the mRNA vaccines clearly says in the interview, they are gene therapy. So, please understand that when I say vaccine or vaccination, I’m really talking about gene therapy.

Spike Protein Disseminates Throughout Your Body

In a recent interview with Alex Pierson, Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Byram Bridle, Ph.D., discussed previously unseen research obtained from the Japanese regulatory agency through a freedom of information act request.

(Video) What Does a Low White Blood Cell Count Mean?

The study was a biodistribution study done by Pfizer, which showed that the mRNA in the vaccine does not stay in and around the vaccination site but is widely distributed in the body, as is the spike protein.

This is a serious problem, as the spike protein is a toxin shown to cause cardiovascular and neurological damage. Once in your blood circulation, the spike protein binds to platelet receptors and the cells that line your blood vessels. When that happens, it can cause platelets to clump together, resulting in blood clots, and/or cause abnormal bleeding. I detailed these and other findings in “Researcher: ‘We Made a Big Mistake’ on COVID-19 Vaccine.”

Dangerous Corners Were Cut

The spike protein also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries. Kirsch cites data suggesting the miscarriage rate among women who get the COVID “vaccine” within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy is 82%. The normal rate is 10%, so this is no minor uptick. Kirsch writes:

“It is baffling that the CDC says the vaccine is safe for pregnant women when it is so clear that this is not the case. For example, one our family friends is a victim of this. She miscarried at 25 weeks … She had her first shot 7 weeks ago, and her second shot 4 weeks ago.

The baby had severe bleeding of the brain and other disfigurements. Her gynecologist had never seen anything like that before in her life. They called in a specialist who said it was probably a genetic defect (because everyone buys into the narrative that the vaccine is safe it is always ruled out as a possible cause).

No VAERS report. No CDC report. Yet the doctors I’ve talked to say that it is over 99% certain it was the vaccine. The family doesn’t want an autopsy for fear that their daughter will find out it was the vaccine. This is a perfect example of how these horrible side effects just never get reported anywhere.”

Disturbingly, the Pfizer biodistribution data package reveals that corners were cut in the interest of speed, and one of the research facets that were skipped was reproductive toxicology. Yet, despite the lack of an initial reproductive toxicology investigation and a rapidly growing number of reports of miscarriages (which is likely to be a significant undercount), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is still urging pregnant women to get vaccinated. Why is that?

Is There Purposeful Suppression of VAERS Data?

What’s more, as discussed in the interview, there’s evidence that data in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is being manipulated as reports that were filed are now missing. Why were they removed? And without the filers’ consent?

Israeli data show boys and men between the ages of 16 and 24 who have been vaccinated have 25 times the rate of myocarditis (heart inflammation) than normal.

Even with that manipulation, the number of deaths reported post-vaccination against COVID-19 is beyond anything we’ve ever seen. According to Kirsch, the rate of death from COVID-19 shots exceeds that of more than 70 vaccines combined over the past 30 years, and it’s about 500 times deadlier than the seasonal flu vaccine, which historically has been the most hazardous.

Other serious effects are also off the charts. For example, Israeli data show boys and men between the ages of 16 and 24 who have been vaccinated have 25 times the rate of myocarditis (heart inflammation) than normal. Additionally, many young people are actually dying as a result of this myocarditis.

Malone points out that, in re-reading the most current version of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) that governs these COVID shots, he discovered that the FDA opted not to require stringent post-vaccination data collection and evaluation, even though they had the latitude to do so.

As noted by Weinstein, this is yet another anomaly that needs an answer. Why did they opt for such lax data capture, because without it, there’s no way of evaluating the safety of these products. You cannot identify the danger signals if you don’t have a process for capturing effects data and evaluating all of it.

“The whole logic of EUA is you’re basically substituting real-time capture of key information for prospective capture of key information,”Malone explains.“But to do that, you’ve got to get the information and it has to be rigorous.”

Other Anomalies

Furthermore, as noted by Weinstein, if you release a vaccine under emergency use — because you say there’s an unprecedented health emergency and there are no other options, therefore it’s worth taking a larger than normal risk — then you still would not give it to people who are at no or low risk of the disease in question.

(Video) Why Nazarin believes the COVID-19 vaccine is unsafe | Unvaccinated

This would include children, teens and healthy individuals under the age of 40, at bare minimum. Children appear naturally immune against COVID-19 and have been shown to not be disease vectors, and people under 40 have an infection fatality ratio of just 0.01%. That means their chances of survival is 99.99%, which is about as good as it gets.

Pregnant women would also be excluded as they are a high-risk category for any experimentation, and anyone who has recovered from COVID would be excluded as they now have natural immunity and have no need for a vaccine whatsoever. In fact, a recent Cleveland Clinic study found people who had tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at least 42 days prior to vaccination reaped no additional benefit from the jabs.

Yet all of these incredibly low-risk groups are urged and even inappropriately incentivized to get vaccinated, and this too is anomalous behavior. Part of the risk-benefit analysis is not only the risk of serious outcomes and death from the disease, but also the availability of alternative treatments, and here we have the third massive anomaly.

We’ve seen a clear suppression of information showing that there are not just one but several effective remedies that could reduce the risk of COVID-19 to a number of cohorts down to virtually zero. Examples include hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, both of which have been safely used for decades in many millions of people around the world.

The precautionary principle dictates that as long as a drug or treatment strategy doesn’t do harm, even if the positive effect may be small, it should be used until better data or better treatments becomes available. This is the logic they used with masks (even though the data overwhelmingly showed no statistical benefit and there are a number of potential harms).

But when it comes to hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, they suppressed the use of these drugs even though they are extremely safe when used in the appropriate doses and have been shown to work really well in many dozens of studies. As noted by Kirsch in his article:

“Repurposed drugs [such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin] are safer and more effective than the current vaccines. In general, early treatment with an effective protocol reduces your risk of dying by more than 100X so instead of 600,000 deaths, we’d have fewer than 6,000 deaths. NOTE: The vaccine has already killed over 6,000 people and that’s from the vaccine alone (and doesn’t count any breakthrough deaths).”

Doctors are also being muzzled and their warnings suppressed and censored. Dr. Charles Hoffe has administered Moderna’s COVID-19 “vaccine” to 900 of his patients. Three are now permanently disabled and one has died. After writing an open letter to Dr. Bonnie Henry, the provincial health officer for British Columbia, in which he stated that he’s “been quite alarmed at the high rate of serious side-effects from this novel treatment,” his hospital privileges were yanked.

Bioethics Laws Are Clearly Being Broken

In a May 30, 2021, essay, Malone reviewed the importance of informed consent, rightly concluding that censorship makes it so that informed consent simply cannot be given. Informed consent isn’t just a nice idea or an ideal. It is the law, both nationally and internationally. The current vaccine push also violates bioethical principles in general.

“By way of background, please understand that I am a vaccine specialist and advocate, as well as the original inventor of the mRNA vaccine (and DNA vaccine) core platform technology. But I also have extensive training in bioethics from the University of Maryland, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, and Harvard Medical School, and advanced clinical development and regulatory affairs are core competencies for me,”Malone writes.

“Why is it necessary to suppress discussion and full disclosure of information concerning mRNA reactogenicity and safety risks? Let’s analyze the vaccine-related adverse event data rigorously. Is there information or patterns that can be found, such as the recent finding of the cardiomyopathy signals, or the latent virus reactivation signals?

We should be enlisting the best biostatistics and machine learning experts to examine these data, and the results should — no must — be made available to the public promptly. Please follow along and take a moment to examine the underlying bioethics of this situation with me …

The suppression of information, discussion, and outright censorship concerning these current COVID vaccines which are based on gene therapy technologies cast a bad light on the entire vaccine enterprise. It is my opinion that the adult public can handle information and open discussion. Furthermore, we must fully disclose any and all risks associated with these experimental research products.

In this context, the adult public are basically research subjects that are not being required to sign informed consent due to EUA waiver. But that does not mean that they do not deserve the full disclosure of risks that one would normally require in an informed consent document for a clinical trial.

(Video) Encephalitis After COVID-19 Vaccine Administration: Perspectives

And now some national authorities are calling on the deployment of EUA vaccines to adolescents and the young, which by definition are not able to directly provide informed consent to participate in clinical research — written or otherwise.

The key point here is that what is being done by suppressing open disclosure and debate concerning the profile of adverse events associated with these vaccines violates fundamental bioethical principles for clinical research. This goes back to the Geneva convention and the Helsinki declaration. There must be informed consent for experimentation on human subjects.”

Experimentation without proper informed consent also violates the Nuremberg Code, which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. This set of principles were developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again.

Lines Have Been Crossed That Must Never Be Crossed

In the U.S., we also have the Belmont report, cited in Malone’s essay, which spells out the ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research, covered under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 45 CFR 46 (subpart A). The Belmont report describes informed consent as follows:

“Respect for persons requires that subjects, to the degree that they are capable, be given the opportunity to choose what shall or shall not happen to them. This opportunity is provided when adequate standards for informed consent are satisfied.

While the importance of informed consent is unquestioned, controversy prevails over the nature and possibility of an informed consent. Nonetheless, there is widespread agreement that the consent process can be analyzed as containing three elements: information, comprehension and voluntariness.”

Americans, indeed the people of the whole earth, are being prevented from freely accessing and sharing information about these gene therapies. Worse, we are misled by fact checkers and Big Tech platforms that ban or put misinformation labels on anyone and anything discussing them in a critical or questioning way. The same censorship also prevents comprehension of risk.

Lastly, government and any number of vaccine stakeholders are encouraging companies and schools to make these experimental injections mandatory, which violates the rule of voluntariness. Government and private businesses are also creating massive incentives to participate in this experiment, including million-dollar lotteries and full college scholarships. None of this is ethical or even legal. As noted by Malone:

“… as these vaccines are not yet market authorized (licensed), coercion of human subjects to participate in medical experimentation is specifically forbidden. Therefore, public health policies which meet generally accepted criteria for coercion to participate in clinical research are forbidden.

For example, if I were to propose a clinical trial involving children and entice participation by giving out ice cream to those willing to participate, any institutional human subjects safety board (IRB) in the United States would reject that protocol.

If I were to propose a clinical research protocol wherein the population of a geographic region would lose personal liberties unless 70% of the population participated in my study, once again, that protocol would be rejected by any US IRB based on coercion of subject participation. No coercion to participate in the study is allowed.

In human subject clinical research, in most countries of the world this is considered a bright line that cannot be crossed. So, now we are told to waive that requirement without even so much as open public discussion being allowed? In conclusion, I hope that you will join me; stop to take a moment and consider for yourself what is going on. The logic seems clear to me.

1)An unlicensed medical product deployed under emergency use authorization (EUA) remains an experimental product under clinical research development.

2)EUA authorized by national authorities basically grants a short-term right to administer the research product to human subjects without written informed consent.

3)The Geneva Convention, the Helsinki declaration, and the entire structure which supports ethical human subjects research requires that research subjects be fully informed of risks and must consent to participation without coercion.”

(Video) Man with vaccine side-effect has message for unvaccinated

Below you can see the tweets of Dr. Malone about the vaccines.

Not too surprising, but here we go.
CDC panel says heart inflammation cases likely linked to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) June 23, 2021

RE COVID genetic vaccines. This is an intriguing data analysis which does raise my concerns regarding the ADE risk. I have not verified the analysis or the data, but I do endorse this type approach to data analysis at this point.

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) June 18, 2021

The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alters barrier function in 2D static and 3D microfluidic in-vitro models of the human blood–brain barrier#Sciencefact, not @PolitiFact .

— Robert W Malone, MD (@RWMaloneMD) June 18, 2021

The Deep State constantly says trust the science, but we won’t trust the biggest heads in the U.S if we listen for their advice.

SHOCKING: The mRNA COVID Jab Damages The Red Blood Cells! - The True Defender ! (1)


Does COVID vaccine affect red blood cell count? ›

Partial vaccination did not alleviate the anemia, but fully vaccinated patients demonstrated higher RBC counts and lower RDWs with significance, albeit the patient ratios with deranged hematological data showed no difference from those without vaccination.

What are the harms of mRNA vaccines? ›

Another cohort study conducted using administrative claims data from the United States concluded that the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis after the mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2) was highest among men aged between 18 and 25 years; however, the incidence was low.

Does the mRNA vaccine cause inflammation in the body? ›

A recent report showed that LNPs used in preclinical nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine studies are (independently of the delivery route) highly inflammatory in mice, as evidenced by excessive neutrophil infiltration, activation of diverse inflammatory pathways, and production of various inflammatory cytokines and ...

How does mRNA affect immune system? ›

In this regard, in the case of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, unlike the immune response induced by natural SARS-CoV-2 infection, where a robust interferon response is observed, those vaccinated with BNT162b2 mRNA vaccines developed a robust adaptive immune response which was restricted only to memory cells, i.e., ...

Does coronavirus damage red blood cells? ›

In particular, RBCs abnormalities recorded in COVID-19 patients may have multiple causes, including: alterations in iron homeostasis that could cause impaired erythropoiesis and accelerated release of circulating RBCs; fragmentation of proteins such as β-spectrin, ankyrin, Band-3 (at the N-terminal level), and lipid ...

What is the rare blood disorder from the COVID vaccine? ›

VITT (vaccine-induced immune thrombocytopenia with thrombosis), also known as thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) and vaccine-induced prothrombotic immune thrombocytopenia (VIPIT), is a newly described disorder that has been associated with the use of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

Is mRNA safer than inactivated vaccine? ›

In terms of vaccine safety, mRNA vaccines showed more relevance to serious adverse events than viral vector and inactivated vaccines, but no solid evidence indicated that COVID-19 vaccines directly caused serious adverse events.

What is mRNA made of? ›

Messenger RNA (abbreviated mRNA) is a type of single-stranded RNA involved in protein synthesis. mRNA is made from a DNA template during the process of transcription.

How long does COVID vaccine last? ›

Protection against getting infected does appear to wane over time. Protection against death and severe disease also drops over time, but more slowly. You can increase your protection by getting a booster from 6 months after your primary course.

Is lymphoma a side effect of mRNA vaccine? ›

In five cases, the lymphoma developed after BNT162b2 mRNA vaccination, including one case after ChAdOx1 nCOV-19, one case after the adenovirus type 26 (Ad26) vaccine and one after mRNA-1273/Spikevax (ModernaTX).

How long does mRNA stay in the body? ›

mRNA, which is the technology used in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, degrades in the body naturally after a few days, and the spike protein it creates only stays for a couple weeks [3].

What is the common side effect of viral vector and mRNA vaccines against COVID-19? ›

The most common side effects are pain at the injection site, fatigue and headache. Other common side effects can include: fever, chills, muscle pain and joint pain. These side effects usually occur within 1-2 days after vaccination and go away within 1-3 days.

How does mRNA get into your cells? ›

To enter cells smoothly, mRNA travels within a protective bubble called a Lipid Nanoparticle. Once inside, our cells read the mRNA as a set of instructions, building proteins that match up with parts of the pathogen called antigens.

Can COVID trigger autoimmune disease? ›

Two studies that use large cohorts now highlight that SARS-CoV-2 infection is linked to a substantially increased risk of developing a diverse spectrum of new-onset autoimmune diseases. Refers to: Chang, R. et al. Risk of autoimmune diseases in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.

How does DNA trigger an immune response? ›

As endogenous DNA in eukaryotes is stored in the nucleus, infectious foreign DNA enters the cytoplasm, where it is detected and responded upon by the host's immune system. Bacterial DNA has been shown to activate the innate immune system and stimulate inflammatory responses [reviewed in Krieg (2002)].

Can COVID affect hemoglobin levels? ›

COVID-19 combines the so-called anemic hypoxia (low hemoglobin concentration), with the hypoxic hypoxia (low hemoglobin saturation). Oxygen deprivation and iron accumulation in lung tissues generate pulmonary vasoconstriction and neoshunting formation, regardless of the incurring pneumonia.

Can COVID booster cause hemolytic anemia? ›

Various case reports have been published regarding AIHA after COVID-19 vaccination, all of whom received the mRNA vaccine. Hemolysis was noted in the majority after the first dose, but was also seen after the second dose. The severity of the symptoms ranges from mild to severe.

Can you take B12 with Pfizer COVID vaccine? ›

Interactions between your drugs

No interactions were found between Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Vitamin B12.

What are the causes of low WBC count? ›

What causes a low white blood cell count?
  • cancer treatment, like radiotherapy.
  • antipsychotic medicines.
  • medicine for an overactive thyroid.
  • some cancers, like leukaemia.
  • infections such as HIV or hepatitis.
  • autoimmune disorders, like rheumatoid arthritis.


1. Long list of side effects to look out for
(Dr. John Campbell)
2. More vaccinated deaths than unvaccinated deaths from covid (US)
(Dr. John Campbell)
3. Destroying spike protein! - COVID-19 update 60
4. COVID-19 spike protein vs. vaccine spike protein: key differences | Dr. Rhonda Patrick
(FoundMyFitness Clips)
5. Health and Hospital Committee Meeting June 30, 2021 2:00 PM
(SCCgov chambers)
6. ACAM Webinar - Dr. Herskowitz Discusses the State of COVID In USA
(Anatara Medicine)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Last Updated: 26/11/2023

Views: 6213

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (54 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Cheryll Lueilwitz

Birthday: 1997-12-23

Address: 4653 O'Kon Hill, Lake Juanstad, AR 65469

Phone: +494124489301

Job: Marketing Representative

Hobby: Reading, Ice skating, Foraging, BASE jumping, Hiking, Skateboarding, Kayaking

Introduction: My name is Cheryll Lueilwitz, I am a sparkling, clean, super, lucky, joyous, outstanding, lucky person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.